
The business, in plain English
Collect premiums today, pay claims later, and price each driver better than anyone else
Progressive sells insurance, overwhelmingly for cars. A driver pays a premium for six or twelve months of cover; Progressive pays for the crashes, thefts and hailstorms that follow, plus the cost of finding, selling to and serving that driver. If the premiums exceed the claims and costs, it makes an underwriting profit. Meanwhile it holds the money between receiving premiums and paying claims — about $99bn of investments at the end of September 2026 — and earns interest on it. A ten-year-old's version: lots of people each pay a little so the few who crash get paid a lot, and Progressive is very good at guessing who will crash.
Its edge is that guess. Progressive prices each driver on more variables, and more accurately, than almost any rival, and since 2008 it has collected billions of miles of real driving data through its Snapshot programme. That lets it charge good drivers less and bad drivers more, so it wins the profitable customers and leaves the unprofitable ones to competitors. The one number that summarises how well this works is the combined ratio: claims plus costs as a share of premiums earned. Progressive's goal, unchanged for decades, is to grow "as fast as we can" while keeping it at or below 96 — a 4% underwriting profit. In 2025 it was 87.4, and for the first nine months of 2026, 87.5.
That is a margin of about 12 cents in every premium dollar, in an industry that over five years made roughly nothing on its underwriting. It produced earnings of $19.23 a share in 2025 and an $8bn dividend in January 2026. At $229.25 the shares are where they were at the end of 2024, 21% below the March 2025 record, because the market has noticed two things: car-insurance prices are now falling, and Progressive's growth has halved.
| Segment (2025) | Net premiums written | Combined ratio | In one line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal auto — direct | $39.6bn (+19%) | 90.1 | Sold online and by phone; 16.8m policies in September 2026. |
| Personal auto — agency | $29.8bn (+11%) | 85.4 | Sold through 40,000+ independent agents; 11.3m policies. |
| Special lines and property | $3.1bn property; special lines in vehicles | 75.1 (property) | Motorcycles, boats and RVs (market leader); homeowners, repositioned. |
| Commercial lines | $10.6bn (−3%) | 87.0 | Small-business vehicles, trucks, taxis; 1.25m policies. |
| Company-wide | $83.2bn (+12%) | 87.4 | Target: 96 or lower, every calendar year. |
The history — the insurer that insured the drivers nobody wanted
From a 1937 Cleveland start-up to America's largest car insurer, by being right about price
| When | What happened | Why it matters now |
|---|---|---|
| 1937 – 1965 | Founded in Cleveland, Ohio; a small car insurer. | Auto from the start. |
| 1965 – 2000 | Peter Lewis, son of a founder, runs it for 35 years: insures "non-standard" drivers others refuse, at prices set by data; pioneers published comparison rates and monthly financial reporting. | Culture of pricing every risk, and transparency. |
| 2008 | Introduces its first wireless Snapshot device to price drivers on how they actually drive; ten billion miles collected by 2014. | The data advantage GEICO lacked for a decade. |
| 2016 | Tricia Griffith, with the company since 1988, becomes CEO. | Continuity of the model. |
| 2021 – 2022 | Used-car and repair inflation after the pandemic: combined ratios of 95.3 and 95.8 — still under 96, while GEICO lost money (104.8 in 2022). EPS falls to $1.18 in 2022. | Discipline in the worst year. |
| 2022 – 2025 | Raises prices hard, then grows fast as rivals retreat: passes GEICO as No. 2 (2022); premiums from $51bn to $83bn; combined ratio 87.4 in 2025; record $5.1bn of advertising. | The boom that set the base. |
| 2026 | Pays an $8bn dividend in January; passes 40 million policies; on S&P's estimate becomes the largest US car insurer. Car-insurance prices start falling; growth slows from 12% to 6%; the stock falls 9.4% on the June results. | Where this report begins. |
Two lessons for an owner. The first is that Progressive's advantage is cultural and has compounded for sixty years: it was built by a man who insisted on pricing every risk and reporting the results every month, and the company still publishes its combined ratio monthly — something almost no other listed insurer does. Buffett said of Lewis in 2022 that "he knew insurance backwards and forwards". The second is that the business is cyclical even when the company is not: earnings per share were $9.66 in 2020, $1.18 in 2022 and $19.23 in 2025. Progressive never lost money on underwriting in those years, but the profits of a car insurer breathe with the price cycle, and an owner has to value the breath, not the peak.
The circle of competence
A business Buffett knows better than any other — from the other side of the field
- That Progressive's pricing and data edge lets it earn a combined ratio in the low 90s on average through the cycle — not the 87 of today, nor the 96 of its target.
- That premiums keep growing mid-to-high single digits a year as it takes share from State Farm, Allstate and smaller insurers, even in a soft market.
- That management keeps returning surplus capital, as it did with $8bn in January, rather than chasing growth at prices below cost.
How it makes money
Underwriting profit, a float that pays it to hold, and a capital rule that limits growth
The underwriting profit. In 2025 Progressive earned $81.7bn of premiums and paid out about 67.6 cents of each dollar in claims for that year's accidents, plus adjustments to earlier years' estimates, plus about 21.5 cents of expenses — including a record $5.1bn of advertising and $1.2bn returned to Florida drivers under a state law that caps insurers' profits there. The result was a 12.6% underwriting margin and $10.2bn of pre-tax underwriting profit, against $3.0bn in 2023.
The float. Because premiums arrive before claims are paid, Progressive holds money that belongs, in effect, to its policyholders: about $47bn of loss reserves and $28bn of unearned premiums in September 2026 — some $51bn net of receivables, by our arithmetic. When the underwriting is profitable, that money costs nothing; Progressive is paid to hold it. Invested mostly in short-dated, high-quality bonds (duration 3.6 years, average rating AA−), it produced $3.6bn of investment income in 2025 at a 4.1% book yield. This is the same economics Buffett has described for decades at GEICO and Berkshire's other insurers.
The limit. Insurance regulators require capital in proportion to premiums; Progressive aims for about $1 of statutory surplus for every $3 of premiums. Each year of growth therefore needs extra capital, which comes from retained earnings. That is why the cash flow statement flatters an insurer: operating cash flow of $17.5bn in 2025 includes the growth of the float, which is not the owners' to spend, and the owners' true share — owner earnings — is net income less the capital the business must keep to grow (Part XI).
The moat
Better pricing, a lower loss ratio, two distribution channels — and no switching costs
| The claim | The evidence | Width · trend |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing accuracy | Five-year underwriting margin 8.3% against the industry's −0.4% (2024 data, company proxy). "Understanding and matching rate to risk is everything in this business" — Griffith, 2025 letter. | Wide · stable |
| Telematics and data | Snapshot since 2008; about half of new direct customers take it; usage-based patents to 2032–35. Berkshire's Ajit Jain in 2022 called telematics "the biggest culprit" for GEICO's lag. | Wide · narrowing |
| Two channels | 57% direct, 43% through 40,000+ independent agents; most rivals are strong in one. Comparison-quote platform in 40 states. | Wide |
| Scale and share | 18.6% of US car insurance in 2025 (NAIC), level with State Farm; on S&P's estimate No. 1 for the year to March 2026. ~16 points of share gained over three decades. | Widening |
| Cost position | Expense ratio 21.5% (2025) against GEICO's 12.4%; Progressive wins on losses, not costs. | Middling |
| Customer loyalty | Annual policies, easy comparison shopping; policy life expectancy down 8% in Q2 2026 as rivals cut prices. | Narrow |
Buffett's description of insurance is not flattering: a commodity product, sold on price, in an industry that habitually under-prices. A durable advantage in such a business can come from only two places — lower costs or better information — and GEICO, which Buffett first bought in 1951, has always competed on the first. Progressive has built the second. Its edge is in the loss ratio: it knows which drivers are profitable, prices them correctly and lets the rest go. Ajit Jain, Berkshire's insurance chief, put the gap at about five points in 2019. Five years of underwriting margins of 8% against an industry at zero are the measured result.
The weakness of the moat is the customer. Nobody is locked in; drivers shop every renewal, and when rivals cut prices — as State Farm, GEICO and Allstate are doing in 2026 — Progressive must choose between matching them and accepting slower growth. It has chosen growth at a profit, and growth has slowed. The data advantage is also being copied: GEICO is rebuilding its telematics and pricing, and its combined ratio beat Progressive's in 2024–25, though by raising prices and shedding customers. We score the moat 7: a genuine and measurable information advantage, in a business with no switching costs.
★★ The central question — what happens when the cycle turns?
Prices are falling, rivals are back, and Progressive's growth has halved
How the cycle works. Car insurance moves in waves. When repair and medical costs jump faster than premiums — as in 2021–22, when used-car prices soared after the pandemic — insurers lose money, raise prices sharply and stop chasing customers. Once prices have caught up, profits are excellent, insurers compete to grow again, prices fall, and margins erode until the next shock. Progressive's 2025 results were the top of such a wave: an 87.4 combined ratio, 12% premium growth and earnings of $19.23 a share.
The turn. The signs of a soft market arrived in 2026. The consumer price index for car insurance turned negative in May and was 5.0% lower than a year earlier in September. Progressive cut its own rates by less than 1% in 2025 and again in the second quarter; State Farm, GEICO, Allstate and USAA all cut rates in Florida. Rivals advertised more and kept their customers longer. Progressive's premium growth slowed from 13% to 5%, and its policies in force from +12% to +6%; in September the number of policies fell from August for the first time. The underlying cost of claims for the current year rose about two points, to 69.6% of premiums, partly from higher severity and tariffs on car parts. On the June results the stock fell 9.4% in a day.
| Signal | Direction | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Combined ratio (9M 2026 · Q3) | 87.5 · 88.7 — still far below 96 | Still very profitable |
| Policies in force | +12% (Sep 2025) → +6% (Sep 2026); first monthly fall | Growth halving |
| Premiums written | +13% (9M 2025) → +5% (9M 2026); Q3 +4% | Revenue growth slowing |
| Car-insurance CPI | +6.1% (Jun 2025) → −5.0% (Sep 2026) | Industry prices falling |
| Current-year loss ratio | 67.5 → 69.6 (9M) | Claims costs rising again |
| Favourable reserve releases | +$1.5bn in 9M 2026, mostly lower injury costs | Flatters 2026 results |
| Advertising | $5.1bn (2025) → +18% in H1 2026 | Spending to defend growth |
Our reading: a soft market, handled from strength — but earnings will fall. Progressive enters this phase with the widest margin in the industry: it can cut prices, keep advertising and still earn far more than its 96 target. That is why its management talks about growth, not profit. But the arithmetic is unforgiving. If the combined ratio drifts back to the low 90s — roughly its five-year average — on premiums growing 5–6% a year, earnings per share fall from about $20 to about $15–16, which is what analysts' 2027 estimates already suggest. The 2026 results are also helped by $1.5bn of releases from earlier years' reserves, which will not recur at that pace. The stock at $229 is 11.5 times today's earnings and about 15 times a normal year's. The question for an owner is not whether Progressive will remain the best car insurer in America — we think it will — but how much of the next two years' decline in profits is already in the price. Our answer: most of it, not all.
| Line | What would be reassuring | What would be a warning |
|---|---|---|
| Policies in force | Growth steadying around 5–6% a year; the September dip proving a one-off. | Two or three more monthly falls. |
| Combined ratio | Monthly readings in the high 80s to low 90s outside catastrophe months. | Readings above 93 without a catastrophe explanation. |
| Reserve development | Small favourable releases, or none. | Unfavourable development, as in 2023. |
| Premiums written | Growth above the rate of price cuts — i.e. still adding customers. | Flat or falling premiums. |
| Buybacks and book value | Continued repurchases below ~$210; book value per share rising. | Buybacks stopping while the price falls. |
Progressive is one of the very few listed companies that lets its owners check the thesis every month, usually in the third week. The variable dividend is usually declared in December and paid in January. The full third-quarter 10-Q is due on 2 November 2026.
The competition
A mutual giant, Berkshire's own insurer, and a field of 230
| Competitor | Arena | Where Progressive stands | Threat |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Farm | Personal auto, home (mutual) | 18.64% vs Progressive's 18.60% of 2025 premiums (NAIC); S&P estimates Progressive ahead for the year to March 2026 ($70.2bn vs $68.7bn). Cutting rates in 2026. | High |
| GEICO (Berkshire Hathaway) | Direct personal auto | 11.6% share; combined ratio 81.5 (2024), 84.7 (2025), 89.3 (H1 2026); lowest expense ratio in the industry; premiums +1% in H1 2026. New CEO since December 2025. | High |
| Allstate | Agency and direct auto | 10.2% share; reported to be growing policies again in 2026 with higher marketing. | Medium-high |
| USAA, Farmers, Liberty Mutual | Personal auto | 6.2%, 3.6%, 2.8% shares; USAA a strong niche (military families). | Medium |
| Carmakers and tech (Tesla, embedded insurance) | Point-of-sale insurance | Buffett in 2019: "I worry much more about Progressive than all of the auto company possibilities." | Low |
| Commercial auto rivals | Trucks, small fleets | Industry ex-Progressive ran at ~104 combined ratio (9M 2025, Progressive's estimate) against Progressive's 87.0 for 2025. | Low-medium |
The duel with GEICO. For Berkshire shareholders, Progressive is the yardstick. At Berkshire's 2019 meeting Buffett said he would "bet significant money that GEICO increases its market share in the next five years", and wondered aloud "which one of us passes State Farm first" (as transcribed by Insurance Journal). GEICO's share fell from about 13.8% in 2022 to about 11.6% in 2024, according to Berkshire's own filings, and it is Progressive that has drawn level with State Farm. GEICO answered in 2023–25 by raising prices, cutting costs and shedding customers, and its margins were spectacular — Buffett called its 2024 improvement "spectacular" in his last letter — but Greg Abel warned in February 2026 that "competitors' rate reductions may extend that pressure into 2026". In the first half of 2026 GEICO's combined ratio (89.3) was worse than Progressive's (86.9) and its premiums barely grew. The two have different weapons — GEICO the lowest costs, Progressive the best pricing — and in a soft market the second has proved the better one so far.
Management, ownership & capital allocation
A rule held for decades, an unusual dividend, and buybacks at the lows
| Decision | When | Our read |
|---|---|---|
| Keep the 96 rule above growth | Every year | "Our focus on achieving our underwriting profitability goal takes precedence over growth" (10-K). Met in every year of the last five — including 2022, when GEICO lost money. |
| Replace the dividend formula with board judgement | Dec 2018 | The variable dividend once followed a formula tied to underwriting profit; since 2018 the board pays out excess capital. Result: nothing in 2022, $4.50 in Jan 2025, $13.50 in Jan 2026. |
| Pay an $8bn dividend | Jan 2026 | About 70% of 2025's net income, returned when the company could not use the capital to grow at a profit. Exactly what Buffett would ask of a business that cannot reinvest. |
| Buy back stock below fair value | Jan – Sep 2026 | ~7.7m shares for ~$1.6bn at about $204 on average, after buying almost none in 2025 at $237. Price-sensitive. |
| Advertise to defend growth | 2024 – 2026 | $1.6bn (2023) → $5.1bn (2025) → +18% in H1 2026. Sensible while new customers are profitable; the risk is buying growth at the bottom of the price cycle. |
Integrity: high. Progressive reports monthly, explains its reserve changes, discloses its litigation in detail and has met its stated profit rule every year we checked. Capital allocation: excellent. It keeps the capital the business needs, pays out the rest in a lump when it has it, and buys back shares only when it judges them cheap — Buffett's 2011 test, "what is smart at one price is dumb at another", applied in practice. Owner mentality: good, with a caveat. The Gainshare bonus aligns nearly every employee with the owners' goals, but executives' wealth comes from stock grants, and none bought shares with their own money this year. We score management and capital 8.
The numbers
Peak earnings, a strong balance sheet, and cash flow that is not what it seems
| Metric | Value | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Net premiums written — 2025 · 9M 2026 | $83.2bn (+12%) · $67.0bn (+5%) | ▼ Growth slowing |
| Combined ratio — 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · 9M 2026 | 94.9 · 88.8 · 87.4 · 87.5 | ▲ Far inside the 96 target |
| EPS — 2024 · 2025 · TTM | $14.40 · $19.23 · $19.85 | ◆ Top of the cycle |
| Investment income — 2025 · book yield | $3.6bn · 4.1–4.3% | ▲ Rising with the portfolio |
| Reserve development — 2023 · 2025 · 9M 2026 | −$1.1bn · +$1.4bn · +$1.5bn | ◆ Swings both ways |
| Book value per share (30 Sep 2026) | $59.51 | ▲ After an $8bn dividend in January |
| Return on equity — TTM · five-year | 34.4% · 26.0% | ▲ Exceptional for an insurer |
| Debt to total capital | 19.6% | ▲ Policy limit 30% |
| Unrealised bond losses | −$3.5bn | ◆ Rates rose in Q3; short duration |
Reading an insurer's accounts. Three things make Progressive's numbers easy to misread. First, the earnings include changes in the estimates of past years' claims: in 2023 those added $1.1bn of costs; in the first nine months of 2026 they removed $1.5bn. Underlying profitability is better judged on the current year's losses, which rose two points in 2026. Second, net income includes gains and losses on the investment portfolio. Third — and most important for valuation — the cash flow statement is not a measure of owners' cash. Progressive's operating cash flow was $17.5bn in 2025, half as much again as its $11.3bn of net income, because a growing insurer collects premiums before paying claims. That money is owed to policyholders; it is the float, and it must stay invested in safe bonds. It is valuable — Buffett built Berkshire on it — but it is not distributable.
| What the feed says | Value | What is true |
|---|---|---|
| Buffett Take intrinsic value | $448.91 ("Buy") | A DCF on free cash flow of 2.69× net income — float growth counted as owner cash. A same-day rerun of the same screen gave $241.78 ("Watch"). We side with the second. |
| Moat note: "returns 16% of FCF" | capital discipline "weak" | The denominator is float-inflated cash flow, and the $8bn paid in January 2026 is missing; dividends declared for 2025 were ~72% of net income. |
| Dividend yield | 8.7% · 7.1% · 6.0% | Different fields, different dates: a variable dividend has no stable yield. 2025's $13.90 declared = 6.1% at $229.25; 2026's is not yet known. |
| Investments, 2024 | $156.2bn | Progressive's balance sheet shows $80.3bn at the end of 2024 ($97.4bn a year later); the feed double-counts. |
| FY2025 consensus EPS | $17.99 | Reported diluted EPS was $19.23; the stored estimate was never updated. |
★ The dividend — a payout that follows the profit
Ten cents a quarter, and whatever capital the business cannot use
| Test | Value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Cover on earnings | ~1.4× (2025) | $13.90 declared on $19.23 of EPS — 72%, by design: the variable part is set after the year's profit is known. |
| 2 · The trend of the payout | 0% – 72% of EPS | From $0.40 (2022) to $13.90 (2025) per share. The regular $0.40 a year is under 3% of normal earnings. |
| 3 · Funded by operations or by paper? | operations | Paid from excess capital: insurance subsidiaries sent $10.0bn to the parent in 2025. Debt rose $1.5bn in 2026, but debt-to-capital stayed at 19.6%. |
| 4 · Balance-sheet room | debt/capital 19.6% | Policy ceiling 30%; ~$6bn at the holding company in September 2026; statutory surplus ~$33bn. |
| 5 · What would force a cut | a bad year | The variable dividend is designed to fall: in 2022 (95.8 combined ratio, bond losses) it was zero. Only the $0.10 a quarter is effectively steady. |
| 6 · The growth rate | none promised | The 10-K warns the policy "likely will result in varying amounts being paid … or no payment in some periods". |
The verdict on the dividend: generous in good years, absent in bad ones — and that is the point. Progressive is not an income stock in the usual sense: anyone buying it for a steady, growing payout will be disappointed. What it offers instead is a dividend that returns the capital the business cannot use, as Buffett argues a company should. In a soft market, with growth slowing, that may be a lot: the company will need less new capital to support premiums growing 5% than it did at 12%. Our expectation is a smaller variable dividend for 2026 than the record $13.50, but a meaningful one, plus continued buybacks below fair value. Compare Chubb, whose regular dividend grows every year but takes a small share of earnings.
★ Valuation — cheap on peak earnings, fair on normal ones
11.5 times what it earns today, about 15 times what it earns in an ordinary year
| Measure | Value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Price · market value (26 Oct 2026) | $229.25 · ~$133bn | 579.5m shares; buybacks reduced the count 1% in 2026. |
| P/E — trailing · 2027 estimates (~$16) | 11.5× · ~14× | Analysts already expect lower earnings. |
| Price to book | 3.85× | Lowest year-end level since 2021; 2.6–5.5× over ten years. |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 34.4% | At 3.85× book, a buyer earns ~9% on the price from today's ROE. |
| Analysts | 16 buy · 22 hold · 4 sell | Mean target $223, range $196–245. |
What is it worth? We discounted owner earnings of about $12 a share at 10% for ten years. If they grow 7% a year for five years and 6% for the next five — premiums growing mid-single digits, the share count falling slightly — and the business is then valued at 16 times owner earnings, Progressive is worth about $240. If the soft market is long and deep — owner earnings of $9, growing only 3–4% a year, ending at 12 times — about $125. If Progressive keeps taking share at a low-90s combined ratio and owner earnings of $14.50 grow 9% and then 7%, ending at 18 times, about $350.
At $229.25 the price sits about 5% below our central value. That is fair, not cheap. Our own Buffett screen put Progressive on its Buy list this morning with a value of $449; that figure treats the growth of the float as cash the owners could take out, which no insurer can. Our playbook does not demand a deep discount for an exceptional business at a fair price, and Progressive is the best operator in its industry — but its earnings are at a cyclical peak and set to fall, and we score the moat 7, not 8 or more. For that we want a margin of safety. Our advice: hold if you own it; buy below about $195 — about 13 times normal earnings, close to the May 2026 low of $190. A soft market that frightens investors will probably offer it.
Risks, lawsuits & controversies
Verified 27 October 2026 — the cycle, the courts, reserves and catastrophes
The risk we rank first is the cycle, not the company. Progressive will almost certainly remain more profitable than its rivals. But in a soft market profits fall for everyone, and the stock trades on the level of earnings. A long period of falling prices — rivals using their recovered margins to buy back customers, as GEICO and State Farm are doing — combined with rising repair and injury costs could take the combined ratio towards its 96 target. Earnings per share would then fall towards $10, and the variable dividend with them.
Second, the courts. Progressive faces class actions over how it values cars written off after accidents (the "negotiation adjustment"), with classes certified in Colorado, North Carolina and Ohio and proposed in more states. The 10-K says an unfavourable outcome in, or settlement of, a significant number of these suits "could, in aggregation, have a material adverse effect"; it considers losses reasonably possible but neither probable nor estimable, and has made no material accrual. Other certified classes concern wage-loss benefits in New York, injury-protection offsets in Arkansas, under-insured motorist cover in New Mexico and the timing of payment communications in Florida; proposed suits include alleged coordination on homeowners cover and the use of carmakers' driving data without consent.
Third, reserves and weather. Insurers estimate claims years before they are paid. Progressive had to add $1.1bn for earlier years in 2023 and released $1.5bn in 2026; a reversal would hit earnings directly. It buys no catastrophe reinsurance for its auto business, so a severe hail season shows up in results — in April 2026 catastrophes added seven points to the month's combined ratio.
| Matter | Status on 27 October 2026 | What is at stake |
|---|---|---|
| Total-loss valuation class actions | Classes certified in CO, NC, OH; more proposed; no material accrual (10-K 2025, 10-Q Q2 2026). | Possibly material in aggregate. |
| Other certified class actions | NY wage-loss, AR injury-protection offsets, NM under-insured cover, FL payment communications. | Smaller, cumulative. |
| Proposed suits | Homeowners-cover coordination; California marital-status rating; telephone-consumer claims; carmakers' driving data. | Uncertain. |
| Florida excess-profit law | $1.2bn credited to policyholders for 2023–25; paid in Q1 2026. | Caps upside when reforms work. |
| Securities litigation | None disclosed. | — |
I have owned GEICO, in part or in whole, for most of my life, and so I have spent a good deal of it watching Progressive. It is the competitor I have worried about most. At our 2019 meeting I said I would bet that GEICO would gain market share over the following five years. I would have lost that bet.
The business deserves its due. Car insurance is a commodity, sold every six months to people who will switch for a few dollars, in an industry that often prices below cost. Progressive has made money on its underwriting in every one of the last five years, including 2022, when costs exploded and we at GEICO lost money. It does it by knowing, better than anyone, which drivers are worth insuring and at what price. It reports to its owners every month, it keeps a simple rule — no more than 96 cents of claims and costs per dollar of premium — and when it has more capital than it needs, it sends it back: eight billion dollars this January.
Now the rub. The profits of the last two years are not normal. Prices for car insurance are falling, competitors who repaired their margins are spending to win customers back, and Progressive's growth has halved in a year. Its earnings have also been helped by releasing money set aside for past claims. Normal years will come back, and in a normal year I think Progressive earns perhaps fifteen dollars a share, not twenty.
At $229 you pay about eleven and a half times this year's earnings, which sounds cheap, and about fifteen times a normal year's, which is fair for a business this good. After keeping the capital it needs to grow, I count about twelve dollars of owner earnings a share. On our central reckoning the business is worth about $240 — roughly the price. A long, deep soft market would make it worth half that; continued gains in share at good margins, half as much again.
So I would hold it, and buy more below $195. I would not sell a business like this because its profits are about to fall from a peak; that is the nature of insurance, and Progressive will come out of the soft market stronger than its rivals, as it did the last time. But I would not pay a full price for peak earnings either. The insurance cycle is reliable in one respect: it eventually frightens people. That is when to buy the best insurer in the market.
— The Buffett Lens · Dividend Line Research · admiring the competition, at a fair price
Buy Below $195The best operator in a cyclical industry, at the top of its cycle. ★ At $229.25 — 11.5× trailing earnings but ~15× a normal year's and ~19× owner earnings of ~$12 — the price sits ~5% below our central value (~$240). Our screen's $449 Buy signal counts float growth as owner cash. Hold if you own it; buy below ~$195 (≈13× normal earnings). Watch monthly policy growth, the combined ratio and reserve releases.
