
The business, in plain English
1,761 big boxes of lumber, paint, appliances and garden supplies — and a new distribution arm for contractors
Lowe's runs 1,761 warehouse-sized stores across the United States, each carrying about 37,000 products — lumber, plumbing, electrical supplies, tools, paint, flooring, kitchens and bathrooms, appliances and everything for the garden. Roughly 70% of its sales go to do-it-yourself homeowners and 30% to "Pros": the electricians, plumbers, handymen and property managers who buy materials for a living. It also installs what it sells, through independent contractors, and since 2025 it owns two distributors that supply larger contractors directly: Artisan Design Group (ADG), which fits out new homes, and Foundation Building Materials (FBM), which sells drywall, ceilings and metal framing. A ten-year-old's version: when something in your house breaks or your parents want a new kitchen, Lowe's sells the parts — and, more and more, the builder's supplies too.
It is a good business in an awkward moment. Americans spend on their homes when they buy them, sell them, or feel richer because their value has gone up. In 2026 almost none of those is happening: existing-home sales are running at about 4 million a year, near multi-decade lows; the 30-year mortgage rate was 7.40% on 8 October, up from under 6% in January; and on 16 September the Federal Reserve raised its policy rate by a quarter-point, to 3.75–4%. Lowe's comparable sales have been flat for three years, and in the second quarter customers made 2.7% fewer trips.
The shares, at $186.00 on 9 October, are 35% below their February high and close to their 52-week low — a deeper fall than Home Depot's (−26%) over the same months, while the S&P 500 rose 14%. This report asks how much of that is the housing market, how much is Lowe's, and what the business is worth through the cycle.
| Category group | FY2025 sales | Share | In one line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Décor | $31.5bn | 36.5% | Appliances, flooring, kitchens & bath, paint. The big-ticket, discretionary end. |
| Building Products | $26.5bn | 30.7% | Lumber, building materials, electrical, millwork, rough plumbing. The Pro's aisle. |
| Hardlines | $24.2bn | 28.0% | Tools, hardware, lawn & garden, outdoor living. Weather-sensitive. |
| Other segment (FBM + ADG) | $2.2bn | 2.6% | Bought in 2025; ~$7.6bn annualised in 2026, at a ~0% margin after amortisation. |
The history — a hardware store that became the eternal number two
North Carolina, the big box, the race with Home Depot, a turnaround and a $10bn bet
| When | What happened | Why it matters now |
|---|---|---|
| 1921 – 1961 | Lucius Lowe opens a hardware store in North Wilkesboro, North Carolina; under Carl Buchan it grows into a building-supply chain for the post-war housing boom, and lists in 1961. | It began as a store for builders. |
| 1979 – 2000s | Home Depot invents the warehouse home centre in Atlanta; Lowe's follows with its own big boxes in the late 1980s and 1990s, aimed more at homeowners — and especially at women shoppers. | Why Lowe's is DIY-heavy and Home Depot Pro-heavy. |
| 2005 – 2010 | Berkshire Hathaway owns Lowe's: a small stake from mid-2005, 7 million shares by 2006, held through the housing crash and sold in late 2010 — when Berkshire also left Home Depot. | Berkshire sold at about $22–25 a share. |
| 2018 | Marvin Ellison, a former Home Depot store chief and J.C. Penney CEO, becomes CEO; first-year write-downs and store exits take the operating margin to 5.6%. | The start of the turnaround. |
| 2020 – 2022 | The pandemic DIY boom: sales peak at $97.1bn. Lowe's sells its Canadian business and buys back $27bn of stock in two years, partly with debt; shareholders' equity turns negative. | The buybacks that shaped today's balance sheet. |
| 2023 | Operating margin peaks at 13.4%; comparable sales start falling as mortgage rates pass 7%. | The high-water mark of the Ellison model. |
| Jun – Oct 2025 | Buys ADG ($1.3bn) and, seven weeks after Home Depot bought the similar GMS, agrees to buy FBM for $8.8bn — 13.4× EBITDA — funded with $5bn of bonds and a $2bn term loan; buybacks paused. | The bet on the big Pro. |
| 2026 | Mortgage rates dip below 6% in January and the shares hit $287 in February; then rates climb back to 7.4%, the Fed hikes, guidance is cut to the bottom of its range, and the shares fall to $186. | Where this report begins. |
Two lessons for an owner. The first is that Lowe's has always been a follower: Home Depot invented the format, built the Pro business first, bought the big Pro distributor first (SRS in 2024, GMS in 2025), and has run at higher margins for most of the last twenty years. Following a great competitor can be a fine business; it is rarely the best one. The second is that Ellison's Lowe's is genuinely better run than the one he inherited — the operating margin went from ~9% to 13.4% in five years — but he spent the proceeds of that improvement on buybacks at prices above today's, and then borrowed for an acquisition just as the housing market's false spring was ending. Over his tenure the shares have returned about 10.3% a year, better than his old employer's 7.5% but well behind the S&P 500's 15%.
The circle of competence
A retailer anyone can understand — and a housing cycle nobody can time
- That housing turnover and remodelling recover within a few years, as rates eventually ease and an ageing housing stock forces repairs — so comparable sales return to low-to-mid single-digit growth.
- That the FBM and ADG acquisitions earn a decent return once integrated — today they make roughly nothing after amortisation — and that leverage falls back to Lowe's 2.75× target by mid-2027 without a cut to the dividend.
- That Lowe's keeps closing the margin gap with Home Depot rather than falling further behind on Pro customers and traffic.
How it makes money
A third of every sale is gross margin; about a ninth reaches operating profit
The arithmetic of a home centre. Lowe's buys goods and sells them at a gross margin of about 33% — 33.5% in fiscal 2025, a little helped by its credit-card programme and lower theft. Out of that it pays wages, rent, utilities and advertising (selling, general and administrative costs, 19.5% of sales in fiscal 2025, up from 18.0% two years earlier as wages rose faster than sales) and depreciation, leaving an operating margin of 11.8%. The business needs ~$2.2bn of capital spending a year and turns most of its profit into cash: free cash flow was $7.65bn in fiscal 2025.
Why flat sales squeeze it. Wages and rents rise every year. With comparable sales flat, those costs grow faster than the sales that cover them, and the operating margin falls — from 13.4% in fiscal 2023 to 11.8% in 2025 and 11.2% guided for 2026. Lowe's has said each point of comparable-sales growth adds roughly ten basis points of margin, which is why a housing recovery would lift profits quickly; the reverse is also true.
Where the money will come from. Ellison's "Total Home" plan has five parts: more Pro customers (from ~19% of sales in 2019 to ~30% in 2025), online sales, installation services, a single loyalty programme for DIY and Pro, and more productive store space. FBM and ADG are the leap to large Pros. Home Depot, for comparison, gets more than half of its sales from Pros and earned a 14.3% operating margin in its latest quarter against Lowe's 13.7%.
The moat
Half of a duopoly — strong against everyone except the other half
| The claim | The evidence | Width · trend |
|---|---|---|
| Scale in a national duopoly | Lowe's and Home Depot together dominate US home-improvement retail; Menards is regional (roughly 350 Midwestern stores, by most estimates), and specialists like Floor & Decor are smaller and comping −2%. Buying power and logistics no newcomer can match. | Wide · stable |
| Bulky, urgent, mixed baskets | Lumber, drywall and a toilet needed today resist online delivery; online sales grow (+15.7% in Q2) but much of it is collected in store. Amazon has made little dent in the category's heavy end. | Wide · stable |
| Returns on capital | Return on invested capital (company definition, lease-adjusted) 36.4% in FY2023, 26.1% in FY2025, 25.5% TTM — still excellent, but falling, partly from the $10bn of acquisitions. | High · falling |
| Pro relationships | Pro share up from ~19% to ~30% since 2019; Pro loyalty programme relaunched in 2025. Home Depot still gets more than half its sales from Pros and owns SRS and GMS. | Narrow · widening slowly |
| Brand and private labels | Kobalt, allen + roth, Craftsman (licensed), appliance leadership; trusted but not decisive against Home Depot's brands. | Moderate |
Buffett has always been wary of retailers. In the 1995 letter, buying R.C. Willey, he wrote that "retailing is a tough business" and that a retailer's "competitor is always copying and then topping whatever you do." Home improvement is the exception that proves the rule: two national chains split the market, the goods are bulky and urgent, and online retailers have made little progress at the heavy end. Lowe's moat against everyone else is real. Its problem is the competitor it shares the moat with — Home Depot copies and tops Lowe's at least as often as the reverse, and has done so in the Pro market for two decades. We score the moat 7: wide against outsiders, merely equal against the one rival that matters.
★★ The central question — is it the house or the rate?
Mostly the rate. But Lowe's is losing more traffic than Home Depot, and it borrowed at the wrong moment
The rate. In early January 2026 the White House directed $200bn of mortgage-bond purchases by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to push rates down; the 30-year rate briefly fell below 6% for the first time in about three years, and Lowe's shares jumped to a February high of $287. The relief did not last. By September the ten-year Treasury yield had passed 5%, the Fed raised its policy rate by a quarter-point to 3.75–4% on 16 September, and Freddie Mac's 30-year rate reached 7.40% on 8 October. Existing-home sales ran at 3.98 million a year in August, and the supply of homes for sale reached its highest in more than a decade. Every listed home-related retailer is struggling: Home Depot comped +1.7% in its latest quarter, Floor & Decor −2.1%, Tractor Supply −1.5%; the homebuilder ETF is down 22% since February.
The house. Within that, Lowe's has done worse than its rival on three measures. Its traffic fell 2.1% in the second quarter against about 1% at Home Depot; its operating margin, 11.2% guided for 2026, is more than a point below Home Depot's; and its shares have fallen 35% against 26%. Some of the gap is mix — Lowe's sells more to DIY homeowners deferring big projects, and DIY is where demand is weakest. In May Ellison called it "the most difficult housing market that I have faced in this business since the financial crisis", and in August Lowe's guided third-quarter adjusted EPS about 7% below last year. Some is the acquisitions, which added sales but no profit yet.
| The worry | The evidence | Cyclical or structural? |
|---|---|---|
| Flat comparable sales | −4.7% (FY23), −2.7% (FY24), +0.2% (FY25), +0.6% and +0.2% in 2026; the whole sector is flat to negative. | Cyclical |
| Falling traffic | Transactions 827m → 801m → 780m (FY23–25), −2.1% in Q2 FY26 vs ~−1% at Home Depot. | Mostly cyclical; partly share |
| Margin slide | 13.4% → 11.2% guided: wage inflation on flat sales, plus FBM/ADG's thin margins and amortisation. | Cyclical + self-inflicted |
| The Pro gap | ~30% Pro vs >50% at Home Depot; Lowe's followed Home Depot into large-Pro distribution, paying 13.4× EBITDA for FBM. | Structural |
| Leverage | ~3.0× lease-adjusted at end-July 2026 (CFO), target 2.75× by mid-2027; buybacks paused until 2027. | A choice, reversible |
Our reading: about three-quarters the rate, one-quarter the house. Nothing in Lowe's numbers suggests a business in decline: it still earns a 25% return on invested capital, its gross margin is stable, online sales grow 15%, and its stores are as well placed as ever for the repairs an ageing housing stock will demand. What it suggests is a cyclical retailer at the bottom of a long housing slump, made more fragile by a balance sheet it chose to lever twice — first for buybacks at the 2021–22 peak, then for FBM in 2025. That fragility is why the shares fell further than Home Depot's. It is also why they would rise faster if mortgage rates fall: management's own rule of thumb is ten basis points of margin per point of comparable growth. The test is not the next quarter but the next spring selling season, and the direction of the ten-year Treasury yield.
The competition
One giant rival, one regional one, and specialists at the edges
| Competitor | Arena | Where Lowe's stands | Threat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Depot | Everything; Pro-led | 2,364 stores plus 1,340+ SRS and GMS branches; Q2 FY26 comp +1.7%, op margin 14.3%; CEO Ted Decker on medical leave since August 2026. | High |
| Menards | Midwest home centres | Private, roughly 350 Midwestern stores by most estimates; aggressive on price where it operates. | Medium (regional) |
| Floor & Decor, Tractor Supply | Flooring; rural and farm | Specialists also comping negative in 2026; they take share in single categories. | Low–medium |
| Amazon, Walmart | Tools, small items, décor | Compete on the light, shippable end of the range; little presence in lumber, building materials or installed projects. | Medium |
| Builders FirstSource, QXO, distributors | Large-Pro supply | FBM now competes with specialist distributors and Home Depot's GMS for drywall and interiors contracts. | Medium |
The pattern. Lowe's competitive problem is a single company. Against Menards, specialists and online retailers its scale and store network are decisive; against Home Depot it is smaller (about $86bn of sales against $160bn-plus), less exposed to the steadier Pro customer, and less profitable. The 2025 acquisitions mirror Home Depot's almost exactly — Home Depot's SRS bought the drywall and ceilings distributor GMS for about $5.5bn in June 2025; seven weeks later Lowe's agreed to pay $8.8bn for FBM, which sells the same products — and they will be judged by whether Lowe's can run them as well. The read-across is in our Home Depot X-Ray of September.
Management, ownership & capital allocation
An excellent operator, a buyback at the top, and a big acquisition at the false dawn
| Decision | When | Our read |
|---|---|---|
| Exit Canada; restructure | 2018 – 2022 | Closed weak stores and sold the Canadian business; part of the five-point margin climb. Good operating discipline. |
| Buy back $27bn of stock | FY2021 – FY2022 | More than free cash flow — 182% and 244% of it — at prices around $200–260, above today's $186; equity turned negative and debt rose by ~$9bn. Buffett's 1984 test asks for "comfortable financial positions" and prices "far below intrinsic value"; neither held. |
| Buy FBM and ADG for $10.1bn | Jun – Oct 2025 | 13.4× EBITDA for FBM, funded with new debt at the top of the false dawn; ~0% segment margin so far. Strategically logical, financially expensive. |
| Pause buybacks; keep raising the dividend | 2025 – 2026 | Right, and late — the pause came when the shares got cheap. A stray ~$300m bought at ~$243 in March 2026. |
Integrity: no veto. Lowe's guidance has been cut but never obscured, and its proxy states plainly that executive performance shares paid nothing because returns missed their targets. Capital allocation: the weak point. Buffett's 1999 letter warned that buybacks are "all too often made for an unstated and, in our view, ignoble reason: to pump or support the stock price." Lowe's spent $27bn buying its own shares at the top of a cycle, then stopped buying when they became cheap, because it had borrowed to buy FBM. That sequence — buy high, stop low — is the opposite of the one that creates value. Operations: excellent. Ellison has made Lowe's a much better retailer. We score management and capital 6.
The numbers
Flat sales, rising debt and a negative balance sheet — explained
| Metric | Value | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales — FY2025 · FY2026 guide | $86.3bn · ~$92.0bn | ◆ +3.1%; 2026 growth almost all acquired |
| Comparable sales — FY2025 · Q2 FY2026 | +0.2% · +0.2% | ◆ Fifth straight positive quarter, barely |
| Operating margin — FY2023 · FY2025 · FY2026 guide | 13.4% · 11.8% · 11.2% | ▼ Wages on flat sales; acquisition amortisation |
| EPS — FY2025 GAAP · adjusted · FY2026 adj. guide | $11.85 · $12.28 · ~$12.25 | ◆ Flat for three years |
| Free cash flow — FY2025 · TTM | $7.65bn · ~$7.0bn | ▲ ~$12.50 a share |
| Debt · cash (31 Jul 2026) | $37.6bn · $3.4bn | ▼ Net ~$34.2bn, ~2.7× EBITDA (3.0× lease-adjusted) |
| Shareholders' equity | −$7.4bn | ◆ From −$15.1bn in Feb 2024 as buybacks stopped |
| Credit ratings | BBB+ / Baa1, stable | ◆ Lowe's commits to staying investment grade |
Why the equity is negative, and why it does not mean insolvency. When a company buys back its shares for more than their book value, the excess comes off its equity. Lowe's has bought back about $64bn of stock since 2014, mostly at many times book value, so its accounting equity went from +$10bn in 2015 to −$15bn in 2024. The business still earns a 25% return on the capital actually invested in it and generates $7bn a year of free cash. What the negative equity does mean is that the balance sheet was levered on purpose, and that the cushion against a long downturn is thinner than a 2.7% yield and a single-A-minus credit rating suggest.
Adjusted versus reported. From 2026 Lowe's excludes ~$0.50 a share of amortisation of the intangibles it bought with FBM and ADG from its adjusted figures — exactly as Home Depot does with SRS and GMS. The amortisation is non-cash, but it is the accounting record of $10bn of real money spent; we use reported earnings and free cash flow alongside the adjusted figure.
| What the feed says | Value | What is true |
|---|---|---|
| 52-week range | $218.80 – $293.06 | Stale: the shares have traded below $218.80 since May. The 52-week closing range is $179.50 (5 Oct 2026) to $287.39 (13 Feb 2026); $186 is 4% above the low. |
| Total debt · net debt/EBITDA | $42.0bn · 3.0× | Includes ~$4.5bn of operating-lease liabilities. Borrowings are $37.6bn; net of cash ~$34.2bn, ~2.7× EBITDA (3.0× on the lease-adjusted basis the rating agencies use). |
| Product segments | FY2023 only | The feed's latest segment split is two years old and omits FBM and ADG. We use the FY2025 10-K and Q2 FY2026 10-Q. |
★ The dividend — paid since 1961, covered 2.6 times
The safest part of the balance sheet; its growth has slowed to match the earnings
| Test | Value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Cover on free cash flow | 2.6× | Twelve months to July: ~$7.0bn of free cash flow against ~$2.7bn of dividends. In FY2025, 2.9×. |
| 2 · The trend of the cover | 1.7× – 5.4× | Never below 1.7× (FY2019) in ten years; 2.4–3.0× since FY2022. The dividend has grown fast, but free cash flow has kept up. |
| 3 · Funded by operations or by paper? | operations | Dividends come from cash flow. Debt funded the FY2021–22 buybacks and the 2025 acquisitions, not the dividend; in H1 FY2026 Lowe's repaid $2.4bn of bonds. |
| 4 · Balance-sheet room | ~2.7× net debt/EBITDA | Net debt ~$34bn; BBB+/Baa1 stable; $5bn of undrawn credit lines. Above the 2.75× lease-adjusted target until mid-2027; equity negative by design. |
| 5 · What would force a cut | nothing visible | Free cash flow would have to fall below ~$2.8bn, from ~$7bn — below even the FY2019 restructuring year ($2.8bn). Buybacks, already paused, are the shock absorber. |
| 6 · The growth rate | slowing: +32% → +4% | +30% (FY2021), +32%, +10%, +4.6%, +4.4%, +4.2% (2026). Ten-year growth ~16% a year; three-year ~6%. Payout ~40% of earnings, against ~25% in FY2021. |
The verdict on the dividend: safe, and growing at the pace of earnings — which is to say slowly, for now. Lowe's has paid a dividend every quarter since it listed in 1961 and, by the count of dividend trackers, raised it every year for more than six decades (Lowe's itself claims only "more than 25 consecutive years"). The yield is 2.7% on $5.00, and the payout takes about 40% of earnings and 38% of free cash flow — leaving room even with the balance sheet stretched. The fast raises of 2021–22 came from catching the payout ratio up toward its target; with earnings flat for three years, the raises have fallen to about 4%. They should quicken when the housing market does. The comparison on our board is Home Depot, whose 3.2% yield takes a larger share of its earnings and was raised just 1.3% this year.
★ Valuation — a good retailer at a trough multiple of trough earnings
15 times flat earnings, with the recovery free
| Measure | Value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Price · market value (9 Oct 2026) | $186.00 · ~$104bn | 35% below February's high; 4% above October's low. |
| P/E — FY2026 adjusted guide · GAAP guide | 15.2× · 15.8× | On ~$12.25 and ~$11.75. |
| Forward P/E — FY2027 · FY2028 | 14.3× · 13.1× | Consensus $12.99 (21 analysts) and $14.16 (12). |
| Forward P/E — FY2029 · FY2030 | 11.7× · 11.2× | $15.86 (5) and $16.67 (9). |
| Typical P/E, 2016–2025 | ~18–22× | Our estimate from price history; Lowe's rarely traded at 15× outside downturns. |
| Free cash flow yield · dividend yield | 6.7% · 2.7% | Against a ~5.2% ten-year Treasury. |
What is it worth? We discounted owner earnings of about $12.25 a share at 10% for ten years. If housing turnover recovers slowly from 2027 and earnings grow ~6% a year for five years (comparable sales, margin recovery and, from 2027, buybacks again) and 4% thereafter, ending at 15 times, Lowe's is worth about $213. If high rates last for years and the acquisitions disappoint — $11.00 growing 2%, 12 times — about $136. If rates fall and the cycle turns hard — $12.75 growing 9% then 6%, 18 times — about $299, near February's high.
At $186 the price sits about 13% below our central value, at a multiple Lowe's has rarely seen outside a downturn, on earnings that are themselves at a cyclical low. We are not buying a bargain on peak earnings; we are buying trough earnings at a trough multiple. But the balance sheet is stretched and the rate cycle is moving the wrong way, so our advice matches what we said of Home Depot: begin accumulating slowly, and buy more near $160 — about 25% below our central value — if the housing slump deepens. Patience will probably be rewarded; leverage means it may also be tested.
Risks, lawsuits & controversies
Verified 10 October 2026 — rates, leverage, the acquisitions and a new tariff-refund suit
The risk we rank first is the rate. Lowe's demand drivers — housing turnover, home-price growth and disposable income — all depend on mortgage rates, and in September the Fed moved them the wrong way. A longer slump would keep comparable sales flat, push margins below 11% and slow the de-leveraging, delaying the return of buybacks. Nothing in it would threaten the dividend; it would threaten the share price's recovery.
Second, the acquisitions. FBM and ADG cost $10.1bn and earned $3m of operating profit in the second quarter after allocated costs and amortisation. They are exposed to new-home construction and commercial interiors, both directly rate-sensitive. Lowe's said FBM would add to adjusted earnings in its first full year excluding synergies; the next four quarters will show whether that holds.
Third, the courts — small. On 3 September 2026 a shopper filed a proposed nationwide class action (McCoy v. Lowe's, N.D. Ohio) alleging that Lowe's passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers and kept the refunds after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down; Lowe's recognised ~$80m of refunds in Q2. The claim is unproven and no class has been certified. Lowe's paid a $12.5m civil penalty under a second lead-paint consent decree with the EPA, approved on 8 July 2026, and is in an insurance-coverage dispute over a $90m wrongful-death settlement. The 10-K and 10-Q describe no proceeding as material, and as of 10 October 2026 we found no securities class action.
| Matter | Status on 10 October 2026 | What is at stake |
|---|---|---|
| McCoy v. Lowe's (tariff refunds) | Filed 3 Sep 2026, N.D. Ohio; proposed nationwide class; not certified. | Unproven; up to the refunds Lowe's receives. |
| EPA lead-paint consent decree | $12.5m civil penalty; second consent decree approved 8 Jul 2026. | Resolved. |
| Insurance coverage (Chubb unit) | Dispute over coverage of a $90m wrongful-death settlement; trial pending (W.D.N.C.). | Up to tens of millions. |
| Product class actions | Halogen work lights, recalled Kobalt yard-tool batteries (2026 filings). | Small. |
| Leverage plan | 3.0× lease-adjusted at end-July; target 2.75× by end of Q2 2027; buybacks to resume in 2027. | Credit rating; capital returns. |
Berkshire owned Lowe's for about five years, through the worst housing crash in living memory, and sold it at the end of 2010 for around twenty-two dollars a share. It has returned more than twelve per cent a year since. I mention this not to wince — though I do — but because the reason for selling then is the reason to look again now: home-improvement retailers look worst when housing is worst, and that is rarely when their owners should leave.
The business deserves its due first. Lowe's is half of a national duopoly in a category that online retailers have barely touched, because nobody wants drywall and a toilet delivered next week when the pipe burst today. It earns a twenty-five per cent return on the capital in its stores, turns about seven billion dollars a year into free cash, and has paid a dividend every quarter since it listed in 1961. Its chief executive has made it a far better retailer than the one he inherited.
Now the rub. The capital allocation has been the reverse of what I would want. Lowe's spent twenty-seven billion dollars buying back its own stock in 2021 and 2022, at prices above today's, partly with borrowed money; then, just as the shares became cheap, it stopped — because it had borrowed again to buy a drywall distributor at thirteen times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. I wrote in 1984 that repurchases make most sense for companies with comfortable financial positions whose shares sell far below their value. Lowe's has the second condition today and not the first. And it remains the number two to a very good number one.
At a hundred and eighty-six dollars you pay about fifteen times earnings that have been flat for three years and are depressed by the worst housing market in a generation. On our central reckoning the business is worth about two hundred and thirteen; if rates stay high for years, nearer a hundred and thirty-six; if the cycle turns hard, close to three hundred. The dividend is safe, covered more than two and a half times.
So I would begin buying slowly here, and buy more near a hundred and sixty. The mortgage rate will not stay at seven and a half per cent for ever, and America's houses will not stop ageing. But a company that has levered itself for the recovery deserves to be bought in instalments, not all at once. Watch the spring selling season, the ten-year Treasury yield, and whether FBM starts to earn its keep.
— The Buffett Lens · Dividend Line Research · a former shareholder, reconsidering
Buy More Near $160Mostly the rate, partly the house: a well-run half of a duopoly at the bottom of a housing slump, levered by its own choices. ★ At $186 — 15× flat, depressed earnings — the price is ~13% below our central value (~$213), with a 2.7% dividend covered 2.6×. Begin accumulating slowly; buy more near $160. Watch mortgage rates, the spring season and FBM's margins.



